Up until now, all of my interactions with UL Power have been excellent. Super responsive (considering time zones), and reasonable.
UL changed a number of ECU parameters last year, and mine had to go back to the factory in Belgium for a software update. So I packed it up in March, and UL arranged for everything else.
In May, I reinstalled the ECU. Everything appeared fine... but the CANBUS feed from the ECU was now on lane B and not lane A. I also thought there were a bunch of sensor failures (but that turned out to NOT be the case).
UL claimed that the CANBUS lane A / B decision is made via the cable. After some sleuthing on the diagrams I found the pins and checked - no jumper. UL then stated they were going to test with my version of hardware - and they found the issue.
The explanation given: I have board version 63, and they are now on 64. They added additional input ports, which shifted the CANBUS lane A / B jumper.
The label on the ECU says
HW ver 1-63
SW ver 07-022
Based on my experience in over 30 years of dealing with hardware and software issues, there are more issues than what I am being told. They GUARANTEE everything is fine, and no need to update the ECU software.
I do not agree.
I am trying to stay positive on UL as 1 bad experience should not taint all of the good things they do and have done. But this has definitely left a bad taste with me.
No comments:
Post a Comment